Ir para o conteúdo
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

Grasshopper vs Stori.

Grasshopper (G72/100) and Stori (S50/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Grasshopper leads Stori 4-1.

Quick verdict Grasshopper 4–1
Score 10 of 1
Fees 10 of 4
Protection 20 of 2
Reach 00 of 3
UX 01 of 2
Grasshopper Stori
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
G Grasshopper 72/100 S Stori 50/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
GGrasshopper
42 tie · 6 loss
SStori
12 tie · 9 loss
Winner: Grasshopper Closest gap: 3rowsEdition №08
G
Grasshopper №29 · OCC 72 /100
S
Stori №77 · CNBV 50 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 72 /100 50 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad Interbank 2.00%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Partner-bank OCC Payment inst. CNBV
Deposit guarantee Per depositor $250,000 US.FDIC Safeguarded MX.IPAB
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 1 country
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No No
UX
Trustpilot Customer score
App store iOS + Android avg 4.2 ★ iOS 4.3 · And 4.0 4.5 ★ iOS 4.5 · And 4.4
Read review Read review

Pick Grasshopper if…

Grasshopper №29

The OCC-chartered US national bank for startups — the structural distinction from Mercury / Brex / Bluevine / Rho is that Grasshopper IS the bank. Direct FDIC cover at the chartered-bank level, multi-bank Cash Sweep extending to $25M. Free business checking with API access. The structural fit for US-incorporated startups wanting a real bank relationship rather than a partner-bank fintech.

Pick Stori if…

Stori №77

Mexican credit-card-first neobank. SOFIPO licence under CNBV. Mass-market underbanked focus (no minimum income requirement) — credit-line access is the structural differentiator vs. Klar. ~3M Mexican customers.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Grasshopper won 1 of 4
  • Best for protection Grasshopper won 2 of 2
  • Best for reach Tied
  • Best for ux Stori won 1 of 2
Frequently asked

Grasshopper vs Stori — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is Grasshopper better than Stori?

Under our v3 methodology, Grasshopper leads Stori 4–1 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Grasshopper 72/100 vs Stori 50/100. Grasshopper is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is Grasshopper or Stori cheaper?

Monthly fee — Grasshopper: €0; Stori: €0. Card FX markup — Grasshopper: Interbank; Stori: 2.00%. Grasshopper wins more fee rows (1 of 4). See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, Grasshopper or Stori?

Grasshopper holds a Partner-bank licence under OCC; deposit guarantee per depositor: $250,000. Stori holds a Payment inst. licence under CNBV; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Grasshopper is the stronger pick on regulatory protection.

Where can I use Grasshopper and Stori?

Grasshopper operates in 1 country; Stori operates in 1 country. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →