Zum Inhalt springen
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

RappiPay vs Stori.

RappiPay (R50/100) and Stori (S50/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Stori leads RappiPay 2-0.

Quick verdict Stori 2–0
Score 00 of 1
Fees 01 of 4
Protection 00 of 2
Reach 00 of 3
UX 01 of 2
RappiPay Stori
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
R RappiPay 50/100 S Stori 50/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
RRappiPay
04 tie · 8 loss
SStori
24 tie · 6 loss
Winner: Stori Closest gap: 2rowsEdition №08
R
RappiPay №78 · PSP under Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia; bank-product layer is Davivienda 50 /100
S
Stori №77 · CNBV 50 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 50 /100 50 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad 3.00% 2.00%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Payment inst. Payment inst. CNBV
Deposit guarantee Per depositor Safeguarded CO.FOGAFIN Safeguarded MX.IPAB
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 1 country
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No No
UX
Trustpilot Customer score
App store iOS + Android avg 4.3 ★ iOS 4.3 · And 4.2 4.5 ★ iOS 4.5 · And 4.4
Read review Read review

Pick RappiPay if…

RappiPay №78

Embedded fintech wallet inside the Rappi super-app. Davivienda partnership provides the underlying bank licence — RappiPay itself is a PSP. Pan-LatAm distribution via Rappi (CO + MX + BR + CL + PE + EC). Strongest super-app distribution channel for retail banking in LatAm.

Pick Stori if…

Stori №77

Mexican credit-card-first neobank. SOFIPO licence under CNBV. Mass-market underbanked focus (no minimum income requirement) — credit-line access is the structural differentiator vs. Klar. ~3M Mexican customers.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Stori won 1 of 4
  • Best for protection Tied
  • Best for reach Tied
  • Best for ux Stori won 1 of 2
Frequently asked

RappiPay vs Stori — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is RappiPay better than Stori?

Under our v3 methodology, Stori leads RappiPay 2–0 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: RappiPay 50/100 vs Stori 50/100. Stori is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is RappiPay or Stori cheaper?

Monthly fee — RappiPay: €0; Stori: €0. Card FX markup — RappiPay: 3.00%; Stori: 2.00%. Stori wins more fee rows (1 of 4). See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, RappiPay or Stori?

RappiPay holds a Payment inst. licence under PSP under Superintendencia Financiera de Colombia; bank-product layer is Davivienda (FOGAFIN member, full-bank cover). RappiPay itself does not hold a bank licence. // TODO(verify).; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Stori holds a Payment inst. licence under CNBV; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Both score equally on regulatory protection rows.

Where can I use RappiPay and Stori?

RappiPay operates in 1 country; Stori operates in 1 country. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →