Zum Inhalt springen
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

Mercury vs Marcus by Goldman Sachs.

Mercury (M70/100) and Marcus by Goldman Sachs (M58/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Mercury leads Marcus by Goldman Sachs 6-1.

Quick verdict Mercury 6–1
Score 01 of 1
Fees 10 of 4
Protection 02 of 2
Reach 01 of 3
UX 02 of 2
Marcus by Goldman Sachs Mercury
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
M Marcus by Goldman Sachs 58/100 M Mercury 70/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
MMarcus by Goldman Sachs
12 tie · 9 loss
MMercury
62 tie · 4 loss
Winner: Mercury Closest gap: 5rowsEdition №08
M
Marcus by Goldman Sachs №56 · OCC 58 /100
M
Mercury №32 · FDIC 70 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 58 /100 71 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad Interbank 1.00%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Payment inst. OCC Partner-bank FDIC
Deposit guarantee Per depositor Safeguarded US.FDIC $250,000 US.FDIC
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 1 country
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No Yes
UX
Trustpilot Customer score 4.4 ★ 1k reviews
App store iOS + Android avg 4.5 ★ iOS 4.6 · And 4.5 4.6 ★ iOS 4.7 · And 4.5
Read review Read review

Pick Marcus by Goldman Sachs if…

Marcus by Goldman Sachs №56

Online-savings + CD-only product from Goldman Sachs Bank USA. No checking, no debit, no investing — purely a yield destination. Goldman institutional pedigree and headline APY among top-quartile US chartered banks. The savings-only counterpart to Ally for depositors with checking elsewhere.

Pick Mercury if…

Mercury №32

Pick if you run a US LLC or C-Corp and want $5M sweep FDIC coverage. Personal accounts not supported.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Marcus by Goldman Sachs won 1 of 4
  • Best for protection Mercury won 2 of 2
  • Best for reach Mercury won 1 of 3
  • Best for ux Mercury won 2 of 2
Frequently asked

Mercury vs Marcus by Goldman Sachs — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is Marcus by Goldman Sachs better than Mercury?

Under our v3 methodology, Mercury leads Marcus by Goldman Sachs 6–1 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Marcus by Goldman Sachs 58/100 vs Mercury 70/100. Mercury is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is Marcus by Goldman Sachs or Mercury cheaper?

Monthly fee — Marcus by Goldman Sachs: €0; Mercury: €0. Card FX markup — Marcus by Goldman Sachs: Interbank; Mercury: 1.00%. Marcus by Goldman Sachs wins more fee rows (1 of 4). See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, Marcus by Goldman Sachs or Mercury?

Marcus by Goldman Sachs holds a Payment inst. licence under OCC; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Mercury holds a Partner-bank licence under FDIC; deposit guarantee per depositor: $250,000. Mercury is the stronger pick on regulatory protection.

Where can I use Marcus by Goldman Sachs and Mercury?

Marcus by Goldman Sachs operates in 1 country; Mercury operates in 1 country. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →