Zum Inhalt springen
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

Grasshopper vs Nomo.

Grasshopper (G72/100) and Nomo (N52/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Grasshopper leads Nomo 4-3.

Quick verdict Grasshopper 4–3
Score 10 of 1
Fees 10 of 4
Protection 20 of 2
Reach 02 of 3
UX 01 of 2
Grasshopper Nomo
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
G Grasshopper 72/100 N Nomo 52/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
GGrasshopper
41 tie · 7 loss
NNomo
31 tie · 8 loss
Winner: Grasshopper Closest gap: 1rowEdition №08
G
Grasshopper №29 · OCC 72 /100
N
Nomo №68 · FCA 52 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 72 /100 52 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad Interbank 1.00%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Partner-bank OCC Payment inst. FCA
Deposit guarantee Per depositor $250,000 US.FDIC Safeguarded GB.FSCS
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 2 countries
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No Yes
UX
Trustpilot Customer score
App store iOS + Android avg 4.2 ★ iOS 4.3 · And 4.0 4.3 ★ iOS 4.4 · And 4.2
Read review Read review

Pick Grasshopper if…

Grasshopper №29

The OCC-chartered US national bank for startups — the structural distinction from Mercury / Brex / Bluevine / Rho is that Grasshopper IS the bank. Direct FDIC cover at the chartered-bank level, multi-bank Cash Sweep extending to $25M. Free business checking with API access. The structural fit for US-incorporated startups wanting a real bank relationship rather than a partner-bank fintech.

Pick Nomo if…

Nomo №68

Sharia-compliant digital bank — Boubyan Bank Kuwait digital arm via Bank of London + The Middle East (BLME, FCA-licensed). Cross-border GCC-UK money management. UK FSCS GBP 85K + Kuwait DPS via parent. Unique dual-passport structure.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Grasshopper won 1 of 4
  • Best for protection Grasshopper won 2 of 2
  • Best for reach Nomo won 2 of 3
  • Best for ux Nomo won 1 of 2
Frequently asked

Grasshopper vs Nomo — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is Grasshopper better than Nomo?

Under our v3 methodology, Grasshopper leads Nomo 4–3 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Grasshopper 72/100 vs Nomo 52/100. Grasshopper is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is Grasshopper or Nomo cheaper?

Monthly fee — Grasshopper: €0; Nomo: €0. Card FX markup — Grasshopper: Interbank; Nomo: 1.00%. Grasshopper wins more fee rows (1 of 4). See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, Grasshopper or Nomo?

Grasshopper holds a Partner-bank licence under OCC; deposit guarantee per depositor: $250,000. Nomo holds a Payment inst. licence under FCA; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Grasshopper is the stronger pick on regulatory protection.

Where can I use Grasshopper and Nomo?

Grasshopper operates in 1 country; Nomo operates in 2 countries. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →