Grasshopper vs Finom.
Grasshopper (G72/100) and Finom (F64/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. A close tie.
| F Finom №45 · DNB 64 /100 | G Grasshopper №29 · OCC 72 /100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Composite score Out of 100 | 64 /100 | 72 /100 |
| Fees | ||
| Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) | €0 Free tier | €0 Free tier |
| FX markup Debit card abroad | 0.70% | Interbank |
| Free FX / month EUR equivalent | €0 | €0 |
| Free ATM Before fee kicks in | — | — |
| Protection | ||
| Banking licence Tier | E-money inst. DNB | Partner-bank OCC |
| Deposit guarantee Per depositor | Safeguarded EU.DGS.NL | $250,000 US.FDIC |
| Reach | ||
| Markets served Licensed jurisdictions | 7 countries | 1 country |
| Crypto Coins available | No | No |
| Stocks & ETFs Self-directed | No | No |
| UX | ||
| Trustpilot Customer score | 4.5 ★ 8k reviews | — |
| App store iOS + Android avg | 4.5 ★ iOS 4.6 · And 4.5 | 4.2 ★ iOS 4.3 · And 4.0 |
| Read review → | Read review → | |
Pick Finom if…
The EU SMB-focused EMI platform that solves the multi-country invoicing-plus-accounting-integration problem better than Qonto, Wise Business, and Revolut Business — local IBAN issuance across NL/DE/FR/IT/ES/PL plus native DATEV / Lexoffice (Germany) and Pennylane (France) integrations is the workflow win for SMBs operating across multiple EU markets. The freelancer-plus-SMB onboarding is structurally paved across entity types (sole trader, GmbH, SARL, BV, SAS, Sp. z o.o., S.R.L.), making Finom the structural fit for German freelancers and EU operators who need country-specific local IBANs without running multiple bank relationships.
Pick Grasshopper if…
The OCC-chartered US national bank for startups — the structural distinction from Mercury / Brex / Bluevine / Rho is that Grasshopper IS the bank. Direct FDIC cover at the chartered-bank level, multi-bank Cash Sweep extending to $25M. Free business checking with API access. The structural fit for US-incorporated startups wanting a real bank relationship rather than a partner-bank fintech.
- Best for fees Grasshopper won 1 of 4
- Best for protection Grasshopper won 1 of 2
- Best for reach Finom won 1 of 3
- Best for ux Finom won 2 of 2
Grasshopper vs Finom — FAQ
Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.
Is Finom better than Grasshopper?
Finom and Grasshopper are tied 3–3 across 12 dimensions under our v3 methodology. Composite scores: Finom 64/100 vs Grasshopper 72/100. The right pick depends on which dimension you weight most heavily.
Is Finom or Grasshopper cheaper?
Monthly fee — Finom: €0; Grasshopper: €0. Card FX markup — Finom: 0.70%; Grasshopper: Interbank. Grasshopper wins more fee rows (1 of 4). See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.
Which is safer for deposits, Finom or Grasshopper?
Finom holds a E-money inst. licence under DNB; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Grasshopper holds a Partner-bank licence under OCC; deposit guarantee per depositor: $250,000. Grasshopper is the stronger pick on regulatory protection.
Where can I use Finom and Grasshopper?
Finom operates in 7 countries; Grasshopper operates in 1 country. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.
Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?
The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.