Zum Inhalt springen
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

Mercury vs Anna.

Mercury (M70/100) and Anna (A58/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Mercury leads Anna 4-3.

Quick verdict Mercury 4–3
Score 01 of 1
Fees 11 of 4
Protection 01 of 2
Reach 01 of 3
UX 20 of 2
Anna Mercury
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
A Anna 58/100 M Mercury 70/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
AAnna
32 tie · 7 loss
MMercury
42 tie · 6 loss
Winner: Mercury Closest gap: 1rowEdition №08
A
Anna №57 · FCA 58 /100
M
Mercury №32 · FDIC 70 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 58 /100 71 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) £11 /mo €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad Interbank 1.00%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier E-money inst. FCA Partner-bank FDIC
Deposit guarantee Per depositor Safeguarded GB.FSCS $250,000 US.FDIC
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 1 country
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No Yes
UX
Trustpilot Customer score 4.6 ★ 6k reviews 4.4 ★ 1k reviews
App store iOS + Android avg 4.7 ★ iOS 4.8 · And 4.6 4.6 ★ iOS 4.7 · And 4.5
Read review Read review

Pick Anna if…

Anna №57

The design-led mobile-first UK SMB neobank — Anna positions itself versus Tide as the friendlier UX with a focus on solo founders and freelancers. The Self Assessment + Corporation Tax filing tools are the structural differentiator versus Tide at the UK freelance tier. FCA-authorised EMI — funds safeguarded, NOT FSCS-protected (same structural trade-off as Tide).

Pick Mercury if…

Mercury №32

Pick if you run a US LLC or C-Corp and want $5M sweep FDIC coverage. Personal accounts not supported.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Tied
  • Best for protection Mercury won 1 of 2
  • Best for reach Mercury won 1 of 3
  • Best for ux Anna won 2 of 2
Frequently asked

Mercury vs Anna — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is Anna better than Mercury?

Under our v3 methodology, Mercury leads Anna 4–3 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Anna 58/100 vs Mercury 70/100. Mercury is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is Anna or Mercury cheaper?

Monthly fee — Anna: £11; Mercury: €0. Card FX markup — Anna: Interbank; Mercury: 1.00%. Tied across fee rows. See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, Anna or Mercury?

Anna holds a E-money inst. licence under FCA; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Mercury holds a Partner-bank licence under FDIC; deposit guarantee per depositor: $250,000. Mercury is the stronger pick on regulatory protection.

Where can I use Anna and Mercury?

Anna operates in 1 country; Mercury operates in 1 country. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →