Aller au contenu
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

Stori vs Ualá.

Stori (S50/100) and Ualá (U49/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Ualá leads Stori 5-2.

Quick verdict Ualá 5–2
Score 10 of 1
Fees 10 of 4
Protection 00 of 2
Reach 03 of 3
UX 02 of 2
Stori Ualá
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
S Stori 50/100 U Ualá 49/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
SStori
22 tie · 8 loss
UUalá
52 tie · 5 loss
Winner: Ualá Closest gap: 3rowsEdition №08
S
Stori №77 · CNBV 50 /100
U
Ualá №81 · BCRA 49 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 50 /100 49 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad 2.00% 4.00%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Payment inst. CNBV Payment inst. BCRA
Deposit guarantee Per depositor Safeguarded MX.IPAB Safeguarded AR.SEDESA
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 3 countries
Crypto Coins available No 6 coins
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No Yes
UX
Trustpilot Customer score 2.4 ★ 5k reviews
App store iOS + Android avg 4.5 ★ iOS 4.5 · And 4.4 4.5 ★ iOS 4.6 · And 4.5
Read review Read review

Pick Stori if…

Stori №77

Mexican credit-card-first neobank. SOFIPO licence under CNBV. Mass-market underbanked focus (no minimum income requirement) — credit-line access is the structural differentiator vs. Klar. ~3M Mexican customers.

Pick Ualá if…

Ualá №81

The default Argentine fintech card (~9M users in AR). Wilobank acquisition (2022) gave Ualá a full Argentine banking licence — converts the wallet to a chartered bank for AR depositors. Mexican + Colombian expansions via local subsidiaries. Argentine inflation-hedge yield (Rendimientos) is a near-mandatory product for ARS holders.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Stori won 1 of 4
  • Best for protection Tied
  • Best for reach Ualá won 3 of 3
  • Best for ux Ualá won 2 of 2
Frequently asked

Stori vs Ualá — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is Stori better than Ualá?

Under our v3 methodology, Ualá leads Stori 5–2 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Stori 50/100 vs Ualá 49/100. Ualá is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is Stori or Ualá cheaper?

Monthly fee — Stori: €0; Ualá: €0. Card FX markup — Stori: 2.00%; Ualá: 4.00%. Stori wins more fee rows (1 of 4). See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, Stori or Ualá?

Stori holds a Payment inst. licence under CNBV; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Ualá holds a Payment inst. licence under BCRA; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Both score equally on regulatory protection rows.

Where can I use Stori and Ualá?

Stori operates in 1 country; Ualá operates in 3 countries. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →