Aller au contenu
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

Zand vs Marcus by Goldman Sachs.

Zand (Z77/100) and Marcus by Goldman Sachs (M58/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Zand leads Marcus by Goldman Sachs 4-1.

Quick verdict Zand 4–1
Score 01 of 1
Fees 00 of 4
Protection 02 of 2
Reach 01 of 3
UX 10 of 2
Marcus by Goldman Sachs Zand
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
M Marcus by Goldman Sachs 58/100 Z Zand 77/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
MMarcus by Goldman Sachs
13 tie · 8 loss
ZZand
43 tie · 5 loss
Winner: Zand Closest gap: 3rowsEdition №08
M
Marcus by Goldman Sachs №56 · OCC 58 /100
Z
Zand №15 · CBUAE 77 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 58 /100 77 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad Interbank Interbank
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Payment inst. OCC Full bank CBUAE
Deposit guarantee Per depositor Safeguarded US.FDIC €250,000 AE.DPS
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 1 country
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No Yes
UX
Trustpilot Customer score
App store iOS + Android avg 4.5 ★ iOS 4.6 · And 4.5 4.2 ★ iOS 4.3 · And 4.0
Read review Read review

Pick Marcus by Goldman Sachs if…

Marcus by Goldman Sachs №56

Online-savings + CD-only product from Goldman Sachs Bank USA. No checking, no debit, no investing — purely a yield destination. Goldman institutional pedigree and headline APY among top-quartile US chartered banks. The savings-only counterpart to Ally for depositors with checking elsewhere.

Pick Zand if…

Zand №15

UAE's first fully-digital full bank — CBUAE-licensed since 2021. Holds its own banking licence (not a partner-bank). Both retail and corporate banking offered. Adds full-bank diversity to the UAE set alongside Wio.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Tied
  • Best for protection Zand won 2 of 2
  • Best for reach Zand won 1 of 3
  • Best for ux Marcus by Goldman Sachs won 1 of 2
Frequently asked

Zand vs Marcus by Goldman Sachs — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is Marcus by Goldman Sachs better than Zand?

Under our v3 methodology, Zand leads Marcus by Goldman Sachs 4–1 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Marcus by Goldman Sachs 58/100 vs Zand 77/100. Zand is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is Marcus by Goldman Sachs or Zand cheaper?

Monthly fee — Marcus by Goldman Sachs: €0; Zand: €0. Card FX markup — Marcus by Goldman Sachs: Interbank; Zand: Interbank. Tied across fee rows. See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, Marcus by Goldman Sachs or Zand?

Marcus by Goldman Sachs holds a Payment inst. licence under OCC; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Zand holds a Full bank licence under CBUAE; deposit guarantee per depositor: €250,000. Zand is the stronger pick on regulatory protection.

Where can I use Marcus by Goldman Sachs and Zand?

Marcus by Goldman Sachs operates in 1 country; Zand operates in 1 country. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →