Aller au contenu
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

Grasshopper vs Mercury.

Grasshopper (G72/100) and Mercury (M70/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Mercury leads Grasshopper 3-2.

Quick verdict Mercury 3–2
Score 10 of 1
Fees 10 of 4
Protection 00 of 2
Reach 01 of 3
UX 02 of 2
Grasshopper Mercury
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
G Grasshopper 72/100 M Mercury 70/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
GGrasshopper
24 tie · 6 loss
MMercury
34 tie · 5 loss
Winner: Mercury Closest gap: 1rowEdition №08
G
Grasshopper №29 · OCC 72 /100
M
Mercury №32 · FDIC 70 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 72 /100 71 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad Interbank 1.00%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Partner-bank OCC Partner-bank FDIC
Deposit guarantee Per depositor $250,000 US.FDIC $250,000 US.FDIC
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 1 country
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No Yes
UX
Trustpilot Customer score 4.4 ★ 1k reviews
App store iOS + Android avg 4.2 ★ iOS 4.3 · And 4.0 4.6 ★ iOS 4.7 · And 4.5
Read review Read review

Pick Grasshopper if…

Grasshopper №29

The OCC-chartered US national bank for startups — the structural distinction from Mercury / Brex / Bluevine / Rho is that Grasshopper IS the bank. Direct FDIC cover at the chartered-bank level, multi-bank Cash Sweep extending to $25M. Free business checking with API access. The structural fit for US-incorporated startups wanting a real bank relationship rather than a partner-bank fintech.

Pick Mercury if…

Mercury №32

Pick if you run a US LLC or C-Corp and want $5M sweep FDIC coverage. Personal accounts not supported.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Grasshopper won 1 of 4
  • Best for protection Tied
  • Best for reach Mercury won 1 of 3
  • Best for ux Mercury won 2 of 2
Frequently asked

Grasshopper vs Mercury — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is Grasshopper better than Mercury?

Under our v3 methodology, Mercury leads Grasshopper 3–2 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Grasshopper 72/100 vs Mercury 70/100. Mercury is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is Grasshopper or Mercury cheaper?

Monthly fee — Grasshopper: €0; Mercury: €0. Card FX markup — Grasshopper: Interbank; Mercury: 1.00%. Grasshopper wins more fee rows (1 of 4). See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, Grasshopper or Mercury?

Grasshopper holds a Partner-bank licence under OCC; deposit guarantee per depositor: $250,000. Mercury holds a Partner-bank licence under FDIC; deposit guarantee per depositor: $250,000. Both score equally on regulatory protection rows.

Where can I use Grasshopper and Mercury?

Grasshopper operates in 1 country; Mercury operates in 1 country. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →