Перейти к содержанию
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

GoTyme vs Tiger BBP.

GoTyme (G52/100) and Tiger BBP (T45/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. A close tie.

Quick verdict Tied 3–3
Score 10 of 1
Fees 11 of 4
Protection 00 of 2
Reach 02 of 3
UX 10 of 2
GoTyme Tiger BBP
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
G GoTyme 52/100 T Tiger BBP 45/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
GGoTyme
31 tie · 8 loss
TTiger BBP
31 tie · 8 loss
Winner: Tied across leaders Closest gap: 0rowsEdition №08
G
GoTyme №65 · BSP 52 /100
T
Tiger BBP №84 · MAS 45 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 52 /100 45 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €60 /mo
FX markup Debit card abroad 1.50% 0.50%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Payment inst. BSP Payment inst. MAS
Deposit guarantee Per depositor Safeguarded PH.PDIC Safeguarded SG.SDIC
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 2 countries
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No Yes
UX
Trustpilot Customer score
App store iOS + Android avg 4.8 ★ iOS 4.8 · And 4.7
Read review Read review

Pick GoTyme if…

GoTyme №65

Joint venture between Tyme Group (South African digital-bank operator) and JG Summit Holdings (PH conglomerate). Fastest-growing PH neobank — ~6M customers in <4 years. Instant in-mall card-issuance via Robinsons Retail kiosks is a structural differentiator.

Pick Tiger BBP if…

Tiger BBP №84

APAC SMB platform from UP Fintech (NASDAQ: TIGR / Tiger Brokers parent). Broker-dealer-backed treasury yield via UP Fintech's brokerage infrastructure is the structural moat versus Aspire (no native yield) and Airwallex (optional Yield in select markets). Cross-Asia payment corridors plus public-company parent transparency (NASDAQ filings). Structurally distinct from APAC payment-institution alternatives.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Tied
  • Best for protection Tied
  • Best for reach Tiger BBP won 2 of 3
  • Best for ux GoTyme won 1 of 2
Frequently asked

GoTyme vs Tiger BBP — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is GoTyme better than Tiger BBP?

GoTyme and Tiger BBP are tied 3–3 across 12 dimensions under our v3 methodology. Composite scores: GoTyme 52/100 vs Tiger BBP 45/100. The right pick depends on which dimension you weight most heavily.

Is GoTyme or Tiger BBP cheaper?

Monthly fee — GoTyme: €0; Tiger BBP: €60. Card FX markup — GoTyme: 1.50%; Tiger BBP: 0.50%. Tied across fee rows. See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, GoTyme or Tiger BBP?

GoTyme holds a Payment inst. licence under BSP; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Tiger BBP holds a Payment inst. licence under MAS; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Both score equally on regulatory protection rows.

Where can I use GoTyme and Tiger BBP?

GoTyme operates in 1 country; Tiger BBP operates in 2 countries. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →