Skip to content
№02 · HEAD-TO-HEAD · Edition №08 · Updated 11 March 2026

Grasshopper vs Liv..

Grasshopper (G72/100) and Liv. (L59/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Grasshopper leads Liv. 3-1.

Quick verdict Grasshopper 3–1
Score 10 of 1
Fees 10 of 4
Protection 10 of 2
Reach 00 of 3
UX 01 of 2
Grasshopper Liv.
Banks compared 2 banks · 12 dimensions
G Grasshopper 72/100 L Liv. 59/100 + Add a third bank
Tally · who wins more rows12 dimensions compared
GGrasshopper
33 tie · 6 loss
LLiv.
13 tie · 8 loss
Winner: Grasshopper Closest gap: 2rowsEdition №08
G
Grasshopper №29 · OCC 72 /100
L
Liv. №53 · CBUAE 59 /100
Score
Composite score Out of 100 72 /100 59 /100
Fees
Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) €0 Free tier €0 Free tier
FX markup Debit card abroad Interbank 1.50%
Free FX / month EUR equivalent €0 €0
Free ATM Before fee kicks in
Protection
Banking licence Tier Partner-bank OCC E-money inst. CBUAE
Deposit guarantee Per depositor $250,000 US.FDIC Safeguarded AE.DPS
Reach
Markets served Licensed jurisdictions 1 country 1 country
Crypto Coins available No No
Stocks & ETFs Self-directed No No
UX
Trustpilot Customer score
App store iOS + Android avg 4.2 ★ iOS 4.3 · And 4.0 4.3 ★ iOS 4.4 · And 4.2
Read review Read review

Pick Grasshopper if…

Grasshopper №29

The OCC-chartered US national bank for startups — the structural distinction from Mercury / Brex / Bluevine / Rho is that Grasshopper IS the bank. Direct FDIC cover at the chartered-bank level, multi-bank Cash Sweep extending to $25M. Free business checking with API access. The structural fit for US-incorporated startups wanting a real bank relationship rather than a partner-bank fintech.

Pick Liv. if…

Liv. №53

First UAE digital-only bank — Emirates NBD subsidiary launched 2017. Targets millennials with free account + lifestyle features. Direct AE DPS cover via parent's CBUAE charter — structurally cleaner than partner-bank competitors.

Best at a glance Axis-by-axis winner — ties skipped.
  • Best for fees Grasshopper won 1 of 4
  • Best for protection Grasshopper won 1 of 2
  • Best for reach Tied
  • Best for ux Liv. won 1 of 2
Frequently asked

Grasshopper vs Liv. — FAQ

Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.

Is Grasshopper better than Liv.?

Under our v3 methodology, Grasshopper leads Liv. 3–1 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Grasshopper 72/100 vs Liv. 59/100. Grasshopper is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.

Is Grasshopper or Liv. cheaper?

Monthly fee — Grasshopper: €0; Liv.: €0. Card FX markup — Grasshopper: Interbank; Liv.: 1.50%. Grasshopper wins more fee rows (1 of 4). See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.

Which is safer for deposits, Grasshopper or Liv.?

Grasshopper holds a Partner-bank licence under OCC; deposit guarantee per depositor: $250,000. Liv. holds a E-money inst. licence under CBUAE; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Grasshopper is the stronger pick on regulatory protection.

Where can I use Grasshopper and Liv.?

Grasshopper operates in 1 country; Liv. operates in 1 country. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.

Compose your own

Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?

The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.

Compose 3-4 banks →