Aspire vs Anna.
Aspire (A70/100) and Anna (A58/100), scored on the same six pillars and compared row-by-row. Every cell is sourced from licence registers and live pricing pages, not opinion. Aspire leads Anna 4-3.
| A Anna №57 · FCA 58 /100 | A Aspire №37 · MAS 70 /100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Composite score Out of 100 | 58 /100 | 70 /100 |
| Fees | ||
| Monthly fee Cheapest paid tier (€0 if free) | £11 /mo | €0 Free tier |
| FX markup Debit card abroad | Interbank | 0.30% |
| Free FX / month EUR equivalent | €0 | €0 |
| Free ATM Before fee kicks in | — | — |
| Protection | ||
| Banking licence Tier | E-money inst. FCA | Partner-bank MAS |
| Deposit guarantee Per depositor | Safeguarded GB.FSCS | €100,000 SG.SDIC |
| Reach | ||
| Markets served Licensed jurisdictions | 1 country | 8 countries |
| Crypto Coins available | No | No |
| Stocks & ETFs Self-directed | No | No |
| UX | ||
| Trustpilot Customer score | 4.6 ★ 6k reviews | 4.3 ★ 1k reviews |
| App store iOS + Android avg | 4.7 ★ iOS 4.8 · And 4.6 | 4.5 ★ iOS 4.6 · And 4.4 |
| Read review → | Read review → | |
Pick Anna if…
The design-led mobile-first UK SMB neobank — Anna positions itself versus Tide as the friendlier UX with a focus on solo founders and freelancers. The Self Assessment + Corporation Tax filing tools are the structural differentiator versus Tide at the UK freelance tier. FCA-authorised EMI — funds safeguarded, NOT FSCS-protected (same structural trade-off as Tide).
Pick Aspire if…
The APAC-first multi-currency business-account platform for SaaS startups and e-commerce sellers — SG-HQ MAS Major Payment Institution with native multi-currency accounts (USD/SGD/EUR/GBP/IDR + HKD/AUD/IDR/MYR) plus local-currency receiving in 30+ countries and local account issuance in 6 jurisdictions (SG, HK, US, UK, EU, AU). Built for APAC startups taking USD revenue who need a SGD operating account without the friction of running Mercury (US) + a SG-bank relationship side-by-side. Stripe + Shopify + Xero integration depth makes Aspire the structural fit for SaaS / e-commerce / fintech operators in the region. MAS-licensed Major Payment Institution status is the structural anchor.
- Best for fees Tied
- Best for protection Aspire won 1 of 2
- Best for reach Aspire won 1 of 3
- Best for ux Anna won 2 of 2
Aspire vs Anna — FAQ
Quick answers to the four questions the search-bar asks most about a head-to-head.
Is Anna better than Aspire?
Under our v3 methodology, Aspire leads Anna 4–3 across 12 dimensions. Composite scores: Anna 58/100 vs Aspire 70/100. Aspire is stronger overall, but the right pick depends on which row matters most to you — fees, protection, reach, or app quality.
Is Anna or Aspire cheaper?
Monthly fee — Anna: £11; Aspire: €0. Card FX markup — Anna: Interbank; Aspire: 0.30%. Tied across fee rows. See the Fees section of the matrix above for ATM caps and the rest.
Which is safer for deposits, Anna or Aspire?
Anna holds a E-money inst. licence under FCA; deposit guarantee per depositor: Safeguarded. Aspire holds a Partner-bank licence under MAS; deposit guarantee per depositor: €100,000. Aspire is the stronger pick on regulatory protection.
Where can I use Anna and Aspire?
Anna operates in 1 country; Aspire operates in 8 countries. Check each provider's signup page for the live country list — eligibility depends on residency, not just the licence footprint.
Want a 3- or 4-way comparison?
The dynamic compare picker handles up to four banks. Add this pair plus one or two more and we'll resolve every row.